I don’t really know how I feel about the gender identity
topic and transsexuals, maybe because I’ve never been in this situation or know
anyone who has (that I know of). I really try to be sympathetic and put myself
in the shoes of these people who go through these things because it seems like
such a tragic life. But then I feel like I’m questioning everything that I
believe and everything that I was taught. Does this mean that my religion is
wrong and that the God I believe in makes mistakes? It becomes a really hard
choice to make as far as what I think is real and what’s right. But I still try
to give people a chance and understand where they’re coming from. So when I
read Devor’s essay I instantly felt conflicted. He gave all of these scientific
facts and studies to back up everything he said. What really caught my
attention was in the beginning how he makes all these references to transgender
children, how kids settle into their gender identities between the ages of
eighteen months and two years. I have to disagree. When I think about babies I don’t
think about anything because I just don’t think they would be able to
comprehend a gender identity at such a young age. They’re only babies. And
besides how would these scientists even know what babies think? Yes they can do
all types of tests on the brain and study how it works, but I’m pretty sure no
one can read a baby’s mind and figure out exactly how they think. As for
children I think they’re too young to know what sex they are. Devor even says
kids don’t think of gender in terms of private parts, but from other things
like hair styles or clothes. So if a little boy wants to be a girl because he
likes playing with dolls and wearing dresses he might tell his parents he wants
to be a girl because to a kid that’s what being a “girl” is. That little boy
might even know that girls and boys are genetically different, but he won’t
understand what this really means. I think it might just mean the boy is
feminine in our society, but even still he’s a boy. That’s the way he was born.
I think if our society became more socially accepting of gender roles than
these issues might go away or become easier to deal with. The question then
becomes how does our society progress towards this? It’s something I’m still thinking
about and trying to wrap my mind around since reading this essay. But I still
feel like okay religion can be wrong in some people’s eyes well so can science.
In the end you have to have your own beliefs to fall back on.
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
"Social Class and Hidden Curriculum of Work" Response
I thought this piece was extremely interesting. I really saw
myself comparing my grade school experiences with what I read. I found that my
education fits more in the affluent professional school. When I read about the
lower class schools I realized how blessed I am to have grown up in a better
environment. I’m certainly not rich and consider my family and myself a part of
the middle class, but because of the community I’m from (Shaker Heights, Ohio)
there’s outstanding diversity amongst class, race and ethnicity. Therefore I received
the chance to go to a good school. It’s so sad to me that because of your
situation you sometimes can’t get the same opportunities as others. I think it’s
totally unfair and completely contradicts what the American dream is supposed
to stand for which is freedom and equality.
From
reading this it seems as if the school systems are set up for failure for the
poor and success for the rich. The poorer students are told to follow steps
exactly, are shunned for thinking outside of the box, and their instructors
bark orders at them as if they’re dictators. The kid’s questions and opinions don’t
matter. And what I find most shocking is that the kids aren’t taught to truly
understand the concepts behind what they’re learning. As long as the students
learn the basics, enough to maintain steady blue collar job s, then everyone
has done their jobs. Unfortunately, there is no room what so ever for growth
for these kids. Their futures don’t look as good as they could be and they’re
only expected to go as far as their parent’s career wise. On the other hand,
the kids who come from wealthy backgrounds are given the exact opposite opportunities.
These students are challenged to recognize not only what they’re learning but
how and why as well. There is great emphasis on individuality, self-expressing,
and creativity. The kids can open their minds, give opinions, and ask
questions. The teachers don’t put themselves on pedestals which create the
drill sergeant soldier mentality like at the poor school. And so because the
poor kids are poor their futures don’t look as bright as say a child from a
wealthy background which allows more flexibility in the way the rich kids are
taught.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)